On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > That being said, I was in favor of including all of hit region but mark > it as at-risk. Once we then go to CR, we can strip it down to what is > implemented. > > > Is there something we as authors can do to encourage vendors to put in the > resources necessary to complete this part of the spec? Now that all parties > have agreed to allow the functionality (no small feat) and all vendors are > highly supportive of a11y... What is blocking implementation? Lack of engineering resources + the fear of being first :-)
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 03:49:43 UTC