- From: Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:41:57 -0500
- To: HTML A11Y TF Public <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, public-canvas-api@w3.org
Hello, The minutes for the Canvas Accessibility Sub Group Teleconference 27 January 2014 are available in HTML and plain text below. Supporting information for this Sub Group can be found on the wiki: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Canvas HTML: http://www.w3.org/2014/01/27-html-a11y-minutes.html TEXT: [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Canvas Accessibility Sub-Group Teleconference 27 Jan 2014 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/01/27-html-a11y-irc Attendees Present Mark Sadecki, Jay Munro, Jatinder Mann, Rich Schwerdtfeger, Rik Cabanier Regrets Chair Mark Sadecki Scribe Mark Sadecki Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Review, verify and close remaining bugs for L1 (see below) 2. [5]23982 Focus Ring out of canvas https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23982 3. [6]23983 Scrolling the focus into view https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23983 4. [7]24340 Change reference to the phrases "focus ring" and "focus region" to "focus outline" https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24340 5. [8]Code Example 6. [9]Testing * [10]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 27 January 2014 <scribe> Meeting: Canvas Accessibility Sub-Group Teleconference <scribe> scribe: MarkS Review, verify and close remaining bugs for L1 (see below) 23982 Focus Ring out of canvas [11]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23982 [11] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23982 JMunro: Seemed pretty straightforward. I made the changes <JatinderMann> [12]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/2dcontext/html5_canvas_CR/ #dom-context-2d-drawfocusifneeded [12] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/2dcontext/html5_canvas_CR/#dom-context-2d-drawfocusifneeded RS: not every platform may support an AAPI. We can say "if". Do you think we need that? JMunro: how about if supported? <JatinderMann> Revision: "The full location of the corresponding fallback element is passed to the accessibility API is supported." <JatinderMann> Sorry, revision: "The full location of the corresponding fallback element is passed to the accessibility API if supported." RS: does the clipping region include the bounds of the canvas element? RC: is that a problem? ... by default the clipping region is infinite RS: somewhere we should say that its clipped to the canvas element RC: It's implied. shouldn't be necessary ... this should answer Apple's question 23983 Scrolling the focus into view [13]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23983 [13] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23983 RS: looks good to me 24340 Change reference to the phrases "focus ring" and "focus region" to "focus outline" [14]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24340 [14] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24340 MS: looks like there are no more references to rings or regions RS: is there a reason we have current path and event loop underlined? JMunro: its underlined throughout the entire section. I copy/pasted it from another reference <richardschwerdtfeger> The context always has a current default path. There is only one current path, it is not part of the drawing state. The current path is a path, as described above. MS: they all have a span element JMunro: that is a holdover from when Path object was still in there ... I can take all of those out. Code Example MS: there is a code example at the bottom of this spec. should we add an example of using drawFocusIfNeeded? JMann: The old example wasn't working in any browser. ... could benefit from a simpler example. MS: Jay, if you send me the old example, I can slim it down and update it. Testing MS: I will list all of the testable statements this week and get started on writing tests. will update you if I need any help. RS: how are we doing with implementations? RC: Mozilla expressed some concerns that hit regions should be used for this. Don't like updating AAPI with regions. Seem like they can be convinced though. ... another concern was if there would be a conflict when we do add hit regions. JM: we should also ping other implementers to let them know the spec has been updated RC: I will try to do that this week ... Step 4 says that "Inform the user that the focus is at the location given by the path." I think that is still a little unclear ... there is no focus at that point. ... maybe focus should go away there. JMann: " inform the user of the location given by the path" <JatinderMann> 4.Inform the user of the location given by the path. JMunro: yeah sure, that makes sense JMann: just want to add an action item to share this with everyone that should be reviewing it. Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [15]scribe.perl version 1.138 ([16]CVS log) $Date: 2014-01-27 23:40:20 $ [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [16] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 23:42:03 UTC