- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:30:10 -0800
- To: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDAGmgR3CvP3MUhxk=BHp4GhCyfDGNJ0YCP5dsTN6pUrHA@mail.gmail.com>
Jatinder, I forgot to ask what you think of the API itself. Do you believe it's OK to have 12 arguments or would a dictionary be better? Rik On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com> wrote: > Seeing that alpha and luminance masking is definitely useful, I would > like to see them added to the spec.**** > > ** ** > > We may want to ensure that the spec provides a very clear mathematical > definition of luma. Luma, luminance, and luminosity are technically > different things. One specific feedback is whether the spec will be > specifying if user agents should assume linear gamma space or 2.2 gamma > space. Basically all images are natively stored in 2.2. gamma space, but > luminance is typically calculated assuming linear gamma. I believe 2.2 > gamma would be faster, as there is no need for the conversion. **** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > Jatinder**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Rik Cabanier [mailto:cabanier@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:42 PM > *To:* public-canvas-api@w3.org; whatwg@whatwg.org > *Subject:* proposal: Add support for masking to canvas**** > > ** ** > > All, **** > > ** ** > > the canvas API does not have a convenient way of supporting masking today. > **** > > There is some support with the compositing operators but it requires quite > a bit of work on the author's part as well as a temporary canvas. In > addition, there is no way to implement a luminosity mask without reading > the pixels and doing the math yourself.**** > > ** ** > > I was thinking of proposing the following new API calls for the 2d canvas > context:**** > > enum CanvasMaskType { luminosity, alpha}; > void maskImage(image, sx, sy, sw, sh, dx, dy, dw, dh, maskType, invert, > clipToMask); > void resetMask();**** > > ** ** > > 'maskImage' will set the mask in the current graphics state which makes it > subject to save/restore. parameters:**** > > image = HTMLImageElement or HTMLCanvasElement or HTMLVideoElement. **** > > Points to set of pixels that will be used as the mask source **** > > ** ** > > sx, sy, etc = describes what portions of the source and destination canvas > to target. (This is similar to drawImage [1])**** > > ** ** > > maskType = sets what type of mask.**** > > luminosity = (default) use the luma value of the pixel**** > > alpha = just look at the alpha channel. ignore the color channel **** > > invert = boolean. (default = false) invert the mask values **** > > ** ** > > clipToMask = boolean (default = true) the area outside of the mask pixels > clipped away. If false, that area is not affected by the mask.**** > > ** ** > > 'maskImage' will set the mask in the current graphics state which makes it > subject to save/restore.**** > > ** ** > > 'resetMask' will remove the mask from the current graphics state.**** > > ** ** > > Some people told me that maskImage is taking too many parameters and that > a dictionary would be better.**** > > ** ** > > What do people think? Is this useful enough to add to the API?**** > > ** ** > > Rik**** > > ** ** > > 1: > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/2dcontext/html5_canvas/#dom-context-2d-drawimage > **** >
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 03:30:38 UTC