Re: [ime-api] Followups from April f2f discussions

why are they doing that?

Sent from my iPad

On May 31, 2013, at 12:48 PM, "Charles Pritchard" <chuck@jumis.com> wrote:

> FYI: Canvas examples in the IME API are being removed.
> 
> 
> -Charles
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [ime-api] Followups from April f2f discussions
> Resent-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 11:37:26 +0000
> Resent-From: public-webapps@w3.org
> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 07:36:52 -0400
> From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
> To: "Hironori Bono (坊野 博典)" <hbono@google.com>, Kenji Baheux <kenjibaheux@google.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <Mike@w3.org>, "Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁)" <kochi@google.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
> 
> Hi Mike, All,
> 
> During WebApps' April 25 discussion about IME API ([Minutes]), Mike
> agreed to a couple of actions for the ime-api spec:
> 
> * ACTION-690 - Ask the IME Editors to remove Canvas examples (e.g.
> images) [on Michael[tm] Smith - due 2013-05-02].
> 
> * ACTION-691 - Smith to take back PFWG feedback to the IME API editor
> (Kochi) and propose we excise the mentions of DOM-based editor use-case
> in the use-case document, and the specific mentions of <canvas> in the
> actual spec [on Michael[tm] Smith - due 2013-05-02].
> 
> It appears 690 has been addressed but I'm not entirely sure of 691.
> Regardless, please update Tracker accordingly
> <https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/users/39522>.
> 
> Also, did the group decide to not support a webpage creating their own
> IME, at least not for v1?
> 
> Lastly, I would appreciate it, if the Editors would please update the
> latest ED [ED] so it has a proper ToC, References, and such.
> 
> -Thanks, AB
> 
> [Mins] <http://www.w3.org/2013/04/25-webapps-minutes.html#item12>
> [ED] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.html>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>