- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:03:55 -0500
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-canvas-api@w3.org, Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, cyns@exchange.microsoft.com, jbrewer@w3.org, david.bolter@gmail.com, chuck@jumis.com, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, mike@w3.org
On 02/07/2012 04:47 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > Paul, Sam, > > You should consider reverting your vacated decision on canvas > caret/selection processing. > > libreoffice now provides a full office suite, including rich text > editing using HTML 5 canvas: > > http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/msg03226.html This is certainly relevant information. Thanks for forwarding it. [snip] > At this point I see no reason to submit a new change proposal. You have > the one we submitted previously. The proposal submitted previously continues to not specify the baseline. Perhaps I missed it, but nothing in that email above specifically supports the removal of the canDrawCustom parameter from drawFocusRing. > Rich > > Rich Schwerdtfeger - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 22:10:59 UTC