Re: approches of canvas accessibility

Hello Benjamin ,

you said :The proposal was rejected in favour of always using including the
content of the <canvas>  element in the *accessibility tree.*
*
*
but in the attachment it is some thing different?!

what's your opinion?

Thanks

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <
bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:34 AM, paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I want to know about adom
> > attribute:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2010JanMar/0185.html
> > that you were researching about it ,finally what has happened to it?
>
> The proposal was rejected in favour of always using including the
> content of the <canvas>  element in the accessibility tree.
>
> --
> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
>



-- 
Paniz Alipour