W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-canvas-api@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: approches of canvas accessibility

From: paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:39:11 +0430
Message-ID: <CADfq16iAebBw=zJ1hvtMYgPMLAa=xdbqqvmgh6nmEaY5uhi_qA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>, Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, public-canvas-api-request@w3.org, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, david.bolter@gmail.com
Hello Benjamin ,

you said :The proposal was rejected in favour of always using including the
content of the <canvas>  element in the *accessibility tree.*
*
*
but in the attachment it is some thing different?!

what's your opinion?

Thanks

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <
bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:34 AM, paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I want to know about adom
> > attribute:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2010JanMar/0185.html
> > that you were researching about it ,finally what has happened to it?
>
> The proposal was rejected in favour of always using including the
> content of the <canvas>  element in the accessibility tree.
>
> --
> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
>



-- 
Paniz Alipour

Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 05:09:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:10:32 UTC