On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > If we wanted to provide remote access to a system you would need to provide access to the same accessibility information on that system. So, in addition to drawing calls coming across you would need the additional accessibility semantics. Why? This isn't how accessible remote system access is handled today. In particular, as I've tried to explain before, providing access to the accessibility tree is insufficient on the dominant business platform, Windows. As you say, another beyond this would be a "very large project (fraught with a lot of gotchas)". I don't see any room for such a project. -- Benjamin Hawkes-LewisReceived on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 02:31:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:10:31 UTC