- From: Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:00:05 -0700
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Great. Just let me know when you've eradicated the other frameworks that have popped up in its place, and a plan for keeping developers working on their own from repeating the same mistake, despite its obvious allure, and we'll just go home. Until you have a workable plan for that, fix canvas accessibility. -----Original Message----- From: Henri Sivonen [mailto:hsivonen@iki.fi] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 9:41 AM To: Matt May Cc: Cameron McCormack; public-canvas-api@w3.org; public-html@w3.org; public-html-a11y@w3.org Subject: RE: hit testing and retained graphics On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:57 -0700, Matt May wrote: > Bespin is the most obvious example of this emergence. Note that Bespin has abandoned <canvas> (by being merged into another non-<canvas>-using project). I think Bespin can be taken as an example of using <canvas> being "doing it wrong" and the solution being not using <canvas>. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 17:01:05 UTC