Re: WBS comments objecting to CP to have single Canvas API for caret positioning and focus ring support

odd. I am not seeing it. as long as the chairs have it.

Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group



From:	Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
To:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:	faulkner.steve@gmail.com, "Gregory J. Rosmaita"
            <oedipus@hicom.net>, public-canvas-api@w3.org,
            public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-html-a11y-request@w3.org
Date:	04/01/2011 11:04 AM
Subject:	Re: WBS comments objecting to CP to have single Canvas API for
            caret  positioning and focus ring support



On 04/01/2011 11:55 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> Sam,
>
> Just an FYI: Steve Faulkner said he also responded but I do not see his
> input in the results.

What I see is:

Steve Faulkner: last responded on 30, March 2011 at 06:38 (UTC)

> Rich
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> CTO Accessibility Software Group
>
> Inactive hide details for Sam Ruby ---03/31/2011 02:19:04 PM---On
> 03/31/2011 02:43 PM, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: > aloha!Sam Ruby
> ---03/31/2011 02:19:04 PM---On 03/31/2011 02:43 PM, Gregory J. Rosmaita
> wrote: > aloha!
>
> From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
> Cc: public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-canvas-api@w3.org
> Date: 03/31/2011 02:19 PM
> Subject: Re: WBS comments objecting to CP to have single Canvas API for
> caret positioning and focus ring support
> Sent by: public-html-a11y-request@w3.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On 03/31/2011 02:43 PM, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote:
>  > aloha!
>  >
>  > in case anyone else was considering responding to the survey on HTML
>  > WG Issue 131 located at:
>  >
>  > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-131-objection-poll/
>  >
>  > since my comments are not-yet reflected in:
>  >
>  >
>
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-131-objection-poll/results#xkeepnew

>
> I will confirm that your comments are now included on that page.
>
> I don't know what is going on with the cache control headers produced by
> the WBS software, but this is a long standing issue. I find that I have
> to use shift-F5 to force a server refresh using Firefox to see the
> lastest comments, but rest assured that they are present and will be
> considered.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>