Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:55:15 -0500
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, faulkner.steve@gmail.com
Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, public-canvas-api@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-html-a11y-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF5F9F9CCD.77CC0F67-ON86257865.00575D7D-86257865.005774B4@us.ibm.com>
Sam, Just an FYI: Steve Faulkner said he also responded but I do not see his input in the results. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger CTO Accessibility Software Group From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net> Cc: public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-canvas-api@w3.org Date: 03/31/2011 02:19 PM Subject: Re: WBS comments objecting to CP to have single Canvas API for caret positioning and focus ring support Sent by: public-html-a11y-request@w3.org On 03/31/2011 02:43 PM, Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: > aloha! > > in case anyone else was considering responding to the survey on HTML > WG Issue 131 located at: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-131-objection-poll/ > > since my comments are not-yet reflected in: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-131-objection-poll/results#xkeepnew I will confirm that your comments are now included on that page. I don't know what is going on with the cache control headers produced by the WBS software, but this is a long standing issue. I find that I have to use shift-F5 to force a server refresh using Firefox to see the lastest comments, but rest assured that they are present and will be considered. - Sam Ruby
(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)