- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:30:49 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-canvas-api@w3.org, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Steven Faulkner wrote: > > >All the other cases I can think of -- braille users with no vision at > >all, speech synth users with no vision at all, text-mode users, etc -- > >the statement that there is no canvas support is actually pretty > >accurate, though not especially kind. It'd probably be better in these > >cases to actually let the user know that they are missing critical > >functionality than to silently say nothing. > > 1. how do they know that it is critical content? > 2. how do they know what canvas support means? how many people who use a > browser (many peopel don't even know what a browser it) now or will in the > future know what it means? > 3. If they are using firefox for example, they ARE using a browser that > supports canvas. > 4. there is no indication that the element is missing apart from the text > that will be encountered inline along with any other text on the page, it > will make no sense. Sure. That's why it's non-conforming. But it's better to say _something_ in this case than nothing. (It's similar to the "your browser doesn't support framesets". Who knew what a frameset was? Users quickly learnt that that was code for "this site sucks" and they went elsewhere.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 11:31:19 UTC