- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:03:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Steven Faulkner wrote: > > > >That makes sense, except I don't understand why we would ever want to > >turn that behaviour _off_. > > if there is focusable content in the canvas sub tree that is fallback, > why would you want it to be tabbable when the canvas is rendered? The same reason as when it's an "accessible DOM" -- to expose it to AT users. (If the author doesn't want this behaviour, it's trivial to empty the <canvas> of the fallback DOM from script after detecting canvas support.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 21:04:27 UTC