Re: Proposal: Canvas accessibility and a media querries approach for alternative content (Action Item 6 in the HTML Accessibility Task Force) from Jonas Sicking on 2010-01-23 (public-canvas-api@w3.org from January to March 2010)

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:53:38 -0800
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, public-canvas-api@w3.org, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Message-ID: <63df84f1001221653l20816693ob39d88fd30cc5195@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> We believe that application authors are likely to implement multiple wholly separate user interfaces for different accessibility needs, so instead we give them the tools to build a single interface adaptable to many needs.

There's a "not" missing somewhere there right? The question if it's
before or after the comma as it makes a big difference :)

/ Jonas

Received on Saturday, 23 January 2010 00:58:07 UTC