I've already informed HTML-WG this is coming. As per our resolution at today's TF call, I will send a formal email to the WG Chairs soon. I will use the URI in this email. The only question at today's WG telecon was whether we were divided on the appropriate approach. I said I understood that we didn't feel in the best position to decide between this, and the forthcoming counter-proposal. So, either proposal had solid support from the TF, and needed wider vetting. Janina Richard Schwerdtfeger writes: > > > Here is a link to the proposal for the canvas accessibility change: > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/canvasaccessibility > > Laura, thank you for pointing out the old proposal. I modifed it, rather > than create a newby, and I included a reference to the nonav proposal > indicating the two combined complete our spec. ready change proposal to > Issue 74. > > Janina, please place this on the HTML working group's agenda next week for > Issue 74. > > Per today's discussion, Steve and I will work with Charles on a counter > proposal that will use a combination of an areamap and this a version of > this caret/selection tracking proposal. We can let the broader development > community choose what the best solution will be in the HTML working group. > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > CTO Accessibility Software Group -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 18:13:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:10:26 UTC