- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:51:06 +0100
- To: Browser Extension Community Group <ij@w3.org>, public-browserext@w3.org
On 2015-10-25 15:59, W3C Community Development Team wrote: > Hello World! > > Draft charter is available for comments: > http://browserext.github.io/charter/ > > Please provide comments / feedback via Github issues > > Any feedback is welcome and please join in the group if you feel this is a > problem worth solving. Basing this work on Chrome extensions is a good idea. There are a couple of things to consider though: 1. The AppStore. Maybe the only realistic is that each vendor maintains a copy although it feels a bit inconvenient? 2. Native Messaging. This is (IMO...) a very important part of the Chrome extension API but unfortunately it suffers from major usability, deployment, and security issues: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2015Oct/0071.html Personally I believe Native Messaging should be a separate effort because it differs from the rest by diving into the OS. Anders > > Thank you > > > > ---------- > > This post sent on Browser Extension Community Group > > > > 'Draft Charter Available for Comments' > > https://www.w3.org/community/browserext/2015/10/25/draft-charter-available-for-comments/ > > > > Learn more about the Browser Extension Community Group: > > https://www.w3.org/community/browserext > > >
Received on Sunday, 25 October 2015 15:51:38 UTC