Re: Printing endpoint from Philip Jägenstedt on 2019-12-12 (public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org from October to December 2019)

From: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 14:09:30 +0100
To: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
Cc: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>, Luke Zielinski <lpz@google.com>, public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
Message-ID: <CAARdPYfBT7Mgo0J1Vi_woNFpe1W9JOWE-1JaSkmHRZGG_na9Xg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:25 PM James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 12/12/2019 10:52, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> > Would this be used only for automating PDF creation, or is there also a
> > testing (WPT) side to it? +Luke Zielinski <mailto:lpz@google.com>
>
> Both are valuable; we want to make it possible to test paginated layout
> and the working hypothesis is that the best way to do that is reftests
> using the print rendering pipeline.

Would that work by rendering the PDF to an image using another tool,
or should this endpoint be able to print directly to an image?

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2019 13:09:44 UTC