- From: Christian Bromann <christian.bromann@saucelabs.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:42:20 +0200
- To: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1F6AE3C6-C0FE-4AD6-90B8-B4AA589902B0@saucelabs.com>
Hey all, After our F2F discussion at TPAC I took an action item home regarding improving the visibility of our work at W3C to be easier discoverable for others. Here is my proposal: I looked what other WGs are doing and saw a general pattern of having a WG website with all information with the url https://w3.org/<wg-name>, e.g. https://www.w3.org/webperf/ https://www.w3.org/sw/ https://www.w3.org/immersive-web/ https://www.w3.org/das/ The repositories for that are under the w3c org, e.g. https://github.com/w3c/web-performance/ <https://github.com/w3c/web-performance/>. Currently our WG site is available under https://www.w3.org/testing/browser/ <https://www.w3.org/testing/browser/> which is not much intuitive and also doesn’t contain much information about the WebDriver spec we are working on and other specs that reference to it. So I would propose: setting up a github repo for the wg website (e.g. https://github.com/w3c/bttwg <https://github.com/w3c/bttwg>) have a website similar to https://www.w3.org/sw/ <https://www.w3.org/sw/> (e.g. https://www.w3.org/btt/ <https://www.w3.org/btt/>) include all important information from the WG including: Working group mission GitHub mailing list CoC links to specs and others A tutorial on how to write WPT have a swagger editor (like https://editor.swagger.io/) with all WebDriver endpoints for easier discoverability I already ported our spec into such swagger definition: https://app.swaggerhub.com/apis-docs/christian-bromann/webdriver/2.0.0 <https://app.swaggerhub.com/apis-docs/christian-bromann/webdriver/2.0.0> have it all setup under https://www.w3.org/btt/ <https://www.w3.org/btt/> or maybe https://www.w3.org/webdriver/ <https://www.w3.org/webdriver/> icymi: a while ago I claimed the webdriver user/org on github: https://github.com/webdriver .. we might can use that too but I guess it all needs to be under the W3C org. However I see other WGs having their stuff in a different github org e.g. https://github.com/immersive-web <https://github.com/immersive-web>. I am happy to build together the website. What do you all think? Cheers Christian
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2019 11:49:00 UTC