W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: Choosing a CR end date

From: Jonathan Lipps <jlipps@saucelabs.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:27:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO0s0551Nov_Vqdai-8wjDN0A_x3TRwcV_K+u99j5gn9kEmqWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>
Cc: James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
I also hope to contribute a section or two towards the end of August once
I'm back from holiday.

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:03 AM, David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com> wrote:

> I have been writing tests for a number of areas so that we can get a
> decent test suite going. I have 3 sections worth of tests locally. I think
> we can easily get the tests into place if people spend a couple hours a
> week doing this.
> David
> On 26 July 2017 at 17:59, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 02/04/17 15:12, Simon Stewart wrote:
>>> We've been rechartered until the end of September. 31st August gives us
>>> 30
>>> days for the review. Does that sound reasonable? I'd like to leave as
>>> much
>>> time for the conformance suite to be finished as possible.
>> 31st August is now 5 weeks away. Do we have any sense of our progress
>> here? My feeling is:
>> * We can probably resolve all spec issues if there is a person month or
>> two of dedicated work on those issues.
>> * I feel like we are a long way off with the testsuite, still. Many
>> sections have no tests, and the tests that we do have are generally not
>> covering all the corner cases. It's hard for me to tell if people aren't
>> working on spec compliance, or aren't producing tests as part of that work.
>> I know that there is interest in adding additional functionality to
>> WebDriver, but I'm unclear what will happen to the group if we are unable
>> to meet this extended deadline.
Received on Monday, 31 July 2017 20:29:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:56 UTC