Re: Include stack trace in error responses

Sounds good to me.


On 13 April 2015 at 13:47, Andreas Tolfsen <> wrote:

> Section 2.4 on the Processing Model doesn't allow us to pass back a stack
> trace when an error occurs.
> This is useful when an executeScript and executeScript throws an error,
> when the remote end has an internal error and a stack trace is available,
> or otherwise when a trace is available.
> My suggestion is to add to “send an error” the following additional step:
> > Let <var>stacktrace</var> be an implementation-defined string containing
> a stack trace report of the active stack frames at the time when the error
> occurred.
> Ayes, nays?

Received on Monday, 13 April 2015 15:21:21 UTC