- From: Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:12:39 +0100
- To: Seva Lo <vlotoshnikov@gmail.com>
- Cc: Luke Inman-Semerau <luke.semerau@gmail.com>, public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
On 10 Apr 2015, at 00:22, Seva Lo <vlotoshnikov@gmail.com> wrote: > Current implementations are inconsistent, and selenium documentation for the API method includes sentence "Think of it as an artist's impression." Selenium API requirements and documentation can change. > If it *is* in the scope and within the authority of the spec to require (MUST) that local ends implement certain functionality, then I think specifying that local end MUST implement [get]PageSource API method would suffice. We decided in the past that local end is explicitly out of scope. But how local ends would implement a shim routine could be governed by Selenium, i.e. that it would be considered a bug if it didn't return document.documentElement.outerHTML (if that's the most sensible thing to return). > If otherwise it is beyond the authority/outside of the scope, then I think keeping the remote end endpoint would help insure the functionality is preserved. (still more specification than "artist's impression" would help) Yes, I think if it's a mobile requirement I have no problem leaving this in the spec.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 11:13:17 UTC