- From: Luke Inman-Semerau <luke.semerau@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:08:28 -0800
- To: public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
Yes, to me it does. +1 for allowing a run-time defined strict or compatibility mode (compatibility being the default for now) On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Marc Fisher <fisherii@google.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > So I am working on the new Python local-end for use in the W3C tests, and I > have run into a general problem. There are places where the spec differs > from the current implementations in significant and breaking ways, including > the three following cases that will have wide-spread impact: > 1. In > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webdriver/raw-file/ac1cadc32661/webdriver-spec.html#json-encoding-of-commands > the spec specifies that a command should contain a JSON payload with three > fields, sessionId, name, and parameters, Selenium uses JSON payloads that > just consist of the value of the parameters field (the other two fields in > implicit in the end point of the command). > 2. In > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webdriver/raw-file/ac1cadc32661/webdriver-spec.html#status-codes > the spec defines status codes as strings, but Selenium uses integers. > 3. The spec doesn't seem to provide for cases where responses to commands > don't include a JSON payload, but Selenium returns an empty body for some > commands on success (such as get and quit). > > Ideally the Python local-end in use for the spec should conform exactly to > the specified behavior, but this does make developing, debugging, and using > it nearly impossible as there isn't currently a remote end that conforms to > the spec. My current thinking is that I should allow it to work in to modes, > 'strict' and 'compatibility'. 'strict' would conform as closely to the spec > as possible, and would therefore be essentially unusable for the time being > (presumably until Selenium 3 which I am assuming will conform to the spec), > and 'compatibility' would allow for tests to be written against current > WebDriver remote ends. > > Does this seem like a reasonable strategy? > > Marc >
Received on Monday, 10 March 2014 10:23:45 UTC