Monday, 30 June 2014
- [Bug 24924] Inconsistent names in screenshot capabilities
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25692] 16 - It's not told what should happen if element is not passed to "takeScreenshot"
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 23869] Describe httpOnly more clearly
- [Bug 25668] Nit: Capabilities.has spec can be simplified
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 26131] 10.4 - atoms contain a different algorithm from defined for getCssValue
Saturday, 28 June 2014
- [Bug 26228] [WebDriver Spec] 11.2.1 executeScript doesn't specify how to handle self-recursive objects
- [Bug 26228] New: [WebDriver Spec] 11.2.1 executeScript doesn't specify how to handle self-recursive objects
Friday, 27 June 2014
- Re: Fwd: Browser Testing and Tools Working Group Extended
- RE: WebDriver Test Suite
- Re: WebDriver Test Suite
- Re: WebDriver Test Suite
- Re: WebDriver Test Suite
- Fwd: Browser Testing and Tools Working Group Extended
Thursday, 26 June 2014
Wednesday, 25 June 2014
Monday, 23 June 2014
Friday, 20 June 2014
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 26130] 10.4 - typos in getCssValue section
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 26130] 10.4 - typos in getCssValue section
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 26130] 10.4 - typos in getCssValue section
- [Bug 26158] New: JSON serialization of element does not make clear that JSON represents an element
- [Bug 26156] Spec missing isEnabled command
- [Bug 26156] New: Spec missing isEnabled command
Thursday, 19 June 2014
- [Bug 26151] New: [WebDriver Spec]: 2.6 Simplify JSON wire protocol to use one URL
- [Bug 26147] New: Don't conflate attributes and properties in getElementAttribute
Wednesday, 18 June 2014
- [Bug 26137] New: [WebDriver Spec]: Algorithm for serializing a result is broken
- [Bug 26131] New: 10.4 - atoms contain a different algorithm from defined for getCssValue
- [Bug 26130] New: 10.4 - typos in getCssValue section
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25059] Web IDL doesn't seem to have "number" type
Tuesday, 17 June 2014
- [Bug 25941] getCssValue isn't defined by the spec
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24132] getElementPosition is not in the spec
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25095] [WebDriver Spec]: getTitle is not documented
- [Bug 25095] [WebDriver Spec]: getTitle is not documented
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
Monday, 16 June 2014
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25095] [WebDriver Spec]: getTitle is not documented
- WebDriver F2F Agenda?
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 26096] WebDriver#get lacks info about timeouts and situation when there is no selected window
Saturday, 14 June 2014
Friday, 13 June 2014
- [Bug 26092] New: findElement doesn't tell that it should find element only inside current element
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 26091] getTitle is not defined by the spec
- [Bug 26091] New: getTitle is not defined by the spec
- RE: Next WebDriver F2F
Tuesday, 10 June 2014
Sunday, 1 June 2014
Wednesday, 28 May 2014
Tuesday, 27 May 2014
Monday, 19 May 2014
Saturday, 17 May 2014
- [Bug 25756] New: 14.3.3 - Meta and Command aren't considered as modifier keys
- [Bug 25755] New: 15.2 - typo "Model" -> "Modal"
Friday, 16 May 2014
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25748] 15.1 - Alerts#getText should raise an error if there is no alert
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25751] 15.2 - use "local end" instead of "client end"
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible?
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25736] "Determining if an element is displayed" section: consistent use of "displayed", "shown", "visible", MUST
- [Bug 25751] New: 15.2 - use "local end" instead of "client end"
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25749] 15.1.1 - clarify if accept or dismiss should be called
- [Bug 25749] New: 15.1.1 - clarify if accept or dismiss should be called
- [Bug 25748] New: 15.1 - Alerts#getText should raise an error if there is no alert
- [Bug 25746] New: 14.3.3 - how should remote end determine current keyboard locale?
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible?
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible?
- [Bug 25736] New: "Determining if an element is displayed" section: consistent use of "displayed", "shown", "visible", MUST
Thursday, 15 May 2014
- [Bug 25148] Provide ability to change a mutable capability value "on the fly"
- [Bug 25148] Provide ability to change a mutable capability value "on the fly"
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24974] The distinction between Capabilities and MutableCapabilities is not useful in the context of this spec
- [Bug 25728] New: element.scrollIntoView should take implement scrolling animation
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25698] 14.3.3 - what is "activeElement"?
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
Wednesday, 14 May 2014
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Registration for the WebDriver F2F on July 7-8
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
Tuesday, 13 May 2014
- [Bug 25698] New: 14.3.3 - what is "activeElement"?
- [Bug 25695] New: 14.3.3 - sendKeys are low level commands
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- [Bug 25694] New: 16.2 section isn't needed as it's possible to take screenshot of "html"/"body"
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25689] DOM-Level-3-Events spec doesn't describe how trusted events should be created
- [Bug 25692] New: It's not told what should happen if element is not supplied
- [Bug 25691] New: WebIDL operations for sending a sequence of MouseAction/TouchAction/MultiAction is not defined
- [Bug 25690] New: 14.2.1 - clickAndHoldAction/moveMouseAction/buttonReleaseAction are not defined
- [Bug 25689] New: DOM-Level-3-Events spec doesn't describe how trusted events should be created
- [Bug 25687] New: Remove "perform" in actions as spec doesn't care about local end API
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25680] Don't tell what User Agent MUST do
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25680] Don't tell what User Agent MUST do
- [Bug 25165] 10.3.1 - Webdriver spec doesn't define getElementText
- [Bug 25682] New: MAP does not use an image
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25681] No "if Javascript is enabled"
- [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible?
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25681] New: No "if Javascript is enabled"
- [Bug 25680] New: Don't tell what User Agent MUST do
- [Bug 25678] New: 7.2.1 - switchToWindow doesn't tell that it should change window focus
- [Bug 25676] New: getWindowSize doesn't tell that it returns outerWidth/outerHeight
- [Bug 25165] 10.3.1 - Webdriver spec doesn't define getElementText
Monday, 12 May 2014
- [Bug 25668] New: Nit: Capabilities.has spec can be simplified
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24974] The distinction between Capabilities and MutableCapabilities is not useful in the context of this spec
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25664] Nit: DOMString is never defined
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25059] Web IDL doesn't seem to have "number" type
- [Bug 25664] New: Nit: DOMString is never defined
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Re: [WebDriver]: WindowHandles ID when resizing/positioning the window
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24974] The distinction between Capabilities and MutableCapabilities is not useful in the context of this spec
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24932] The style of Section 4.1 is widely different than the style for the other sections describing commands
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24932] The style of Section 4.1 is widely different than the style for the other sections describing commands
Friday, 9 May 2014
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24978] Section 10.3.1 doesn't specify the exact color format to which implementation should transform style
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24978] Section 10.3.1 doesn't specify the exact color format to which implementation should transform style
Thursday, 8 May 2014
- [WebDriver] Fwd: [Bug 24974] New: The distinction between Capabilities and MutableCapabilities is not useful in the context of this spec
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24978] Section 10.3.1 doesn't specify the exact color format to which implementation should transform style
- [Bug 24980] Incorrect link for selectable
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24987] Should window resizing and positioning methods take a windowHandle
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24990] Defining List of WebElement seems unnecessary
Tuesday, 6 May 2014
Monday, 5 May 2014
Tuesday, 29 April 2014
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 23950] New status code "invalid argument"
- [WebDriver]: WindowHandles ID when resizing/positioning the window
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25022] [WebDriver Spec]: Need to add a 'no such session' status code
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25064] 11.1 - Argument isn't allowed to be null/dictionary/array
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25063] Incorrect wording in section 7.3.1
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25059] Web IDL doesn't seem to have "number" type
Monday, 28 April 2014
- [Bug 25068] Cookie lacks secure and max-age attribute
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25333] 2.1, 2,2 - sessionId/name/value are not marked as nullable
- [Bug 25490] New: [WebDriver Spec]: Section 5.1.1 Constants - Conservative and Normal have the same behaviour
Thursday, 24 April 2014
- Re: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of vendor prefixes for extensions?
- Re: Working Group Charter
Wednesday, 23 April 2014
- Working Group Charter
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25184] 10.1 - Use "element has hidden attribute" instead of "element is hidden"
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 24979] The spec is missing section about switching to modal dialog
- Re: Next WebDriver F2F
- Next WebDriver F2F
- [Bug 25165] 10.3.1 - Webdriver spec doesn't define getElementText
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible?
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25183] 10.1 - IMO it's not needed to say that "unless the element is a text node" as element can't be text node
- [Bug 25418] New: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of vendor prefixes for extensions?
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25332] 1.4 - keyword "OPTIONALLY" isn't actually used in the spec
Saturday, 12 April 2014
- [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1
- [Bug 25331] 1.1 - "It is not intended as light bed time reading."
- [Bug 25333] New: 2.1, 2,2 - sessionId/name/value are not marked as nullable
- [Bug 25332] New: 1,4 - keyword "OPTIONALLY" isn't really used in the specification
- [Bug 25331] New: 1.1 - "It is not intended as light bed time reading."
Thursday, 10 April 2014
- [Bug 25318] New: It's not clear why wait is nullable and optional
- [Bug 25317] New: Touch gestures API marks some high-level methods as low level one
- [user input] Spec feedback
- [Bug 25308] New: [WebDriver Spec]: 10.4 What language information should be considered for text-transform
- [Bug 25307] New: [WebDriver Spec]: 10.4 effective CSS whitespace style needs to be defined
- [Bug 25306] New: [WebDriver Spec]:unicode whitespace character class are seen in the current webdriver spec
Tuesday, 8 April 2014
- [Bug 25293] New: Touch gestures API doesn't provide a way to do slow swipe
- [Bug 25286] New: Define whether pixel-based operations occur using device pixels or CSS reference pixels