- From: Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:38:23 +0900
- To: Luca Passani <luca.passani@gmail.com>
- Cc: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Not sure why fingers are pointing at transcoders here. A malfunctioning reverse proxy, which can exist in a non-mobile context (i.e. load balancing) could as well have the exact same effect. Cheers, Sangwhan On 2010/01/18, at 6:07 PM, Luca Passani wrote: > While I don't have definitive proof that a transcoder is to blame > here, this article definitely smells like one is involved. > > You guys should think carefully about what you do when you > legitimize transcoders. Web access to gmail, facebook or even your > netbank can be at the mercy of what some programmer in israel, > silicon valley or chicago has been drinking on a certain evening 8 > months earlier.... > > Luca > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [wmlprogramming] Transcoder? > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:34:00 +0100 > > > > > > > > > > > > This one definitely seems a rogue transcoder: > http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2010/01/15/ap_exclusive_network_flaw_causes_scary_web_error/ > > djn > > > > -- Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>, Opera Software ASA Skype: innodb1 | Mobile: +372-5971-6147
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 09:39:04 UTC