W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: ACTION-1021 Tweak CT Problem Statement and Propose to Group

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:30:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4AE01809.5040606@w3.org>
To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
CC: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Thanks Jo!

I have prepared the document for publication. Publication should be next 
Tuesday.

FYI, I updated the links to the Mobile Web Best Practices and mobileOK 
specs in the appendices to point to the final W3C Recommendations.

Francois.


Jo Rabin wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I updated the CT Landscape/Problem Statement doc "in place" [1] and diff 
> from last published version [2]. Per the resolution yesterday we are now 
> "good to go" for publication.
> 
> Jo
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html 
> 
> (http://tinyurl.com/yjqphe2)
> 
> [2]
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-ct-landscape-20071025/&doc2=http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html 
> 
> (http://tinyurl.com/yzww24f)
> 
> 
> On 20/10/2009 08:55, Francois Daoust wrote:
>> Hi Jo,
>>
>> Given that the CT Landscape is to remain as is for a long time, I 
>> would not anchor it in time with a mention of the Last Call Working 
>> Draft of the guidelines. The guidelines should not stay as last call 
>> forever. I would also clarify that by "historical" we mean the 
>> guidelines were inspired by this document but may precisely follow 
>> this set of requirements. Or is "historical" clear enough for 
>> everyone? I suggest the two following changes.
>>
>>
>> In the abstract, I suggest to replace:
>> [[ In this revision the document is largely historical - the 
>> Transformation Guidelines document having been published as a Last 
>> Call Working Draft . ]]
>>
>> by:
>> [[ In this revision the document is largely historical: the Content 
>> Transformation Guidelines document, published under the title 
>> "Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies" [LINK to 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/] and initially inspired by the set 
>> of requirements identified in this document, has evolved based on 
>> available technologies and feedback and may not precisely follow these 
>> requirements anymore. ]]
>>
>> or by something similar in real English ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> In the Status of This document section, I would also replace:
>> [[ non-normative W3C Recommendation on content adaptation ]]
>> by:
>> [[ Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies ]]
>> and update the link to point to
>>  http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/
>> as the charter it currently points to is obsolete.
>>
>> I'll update the Status of This Document section when I prepare the 
>> document for publication anyway to note that the we do not expect to 
>> work on this document any further (and as required to please the 
>> publication rules checker), so I can handle that second update unless 
>> someone disagrees.
>>
>>
>> Francois.
>>
>>
>> Jo Rabin wrote:
>>> As discussed on last week's call I have made some minor edits to the 
>>> CT Problem Statement. I've taken the liberty of preparing it for 
>>> publication on Thursday next week in the hope that we will agree that 
>>> on our call on Tuesday.
>>>
>>> The document is at [1] and diff from the published version is at [2].
>>>
>>> Jo
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html 
>>>
>>>
>>> (http://tinyurl.com/yjqphe2)
>>>
>>>
>>> [2] 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-ct-landscape-20071025/&doc2=http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html 
>>>
>>>
>>> (http://tinyurl.com/yzww24f)
>>>
>>>
> 
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 08:30:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:54 UTC