- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:30:01 +0200
- To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- CC: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Thanks Jo! I have prepared the document for publication. Publication should be next Tuesday. FYI, I updated the links to the Mobile Web Best Practices and mobileOK specs in the appendices to point to the final W3C Recommendations. Francois. Jo Rabin wrote: > Hi > > I updated the CT Landscape/Problem Statement doc "in place" [1] and diff > from last published version [2]. Per the resolution yesterday we are now > "good to go" for publication. > > Jo > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html > > (http://tinyurl.com/yjqphe2) > > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-ct-landscape-20071025/&doc2=http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html > > (http://tinyurl.com/yzww24f) > > > On 20/10/2009 08:55, Francois Daoust wrote: >> Hi Jo, >> >> Given that the CT Landscape is to remain as is for a long time, I >> would not anchor it in time with a mention of the Last Call Working >> Draft of the guidelines. The guidelines should not stay as last call >> forever. I would also clarify that by "historical" we mean the >> guidelines were inspired by this document but may precisely follow >> this set of requirements. Or is "historical" clear enough for >> everyone? I suggest the two following changes. >> >> >> In the abstract, I suggest to replace: >> [[ In this revision the document is largely historical - the >> Transformation Guidelines document having been published as a Last >> Call Working Draft . ]] >> >> by: >> [[ In this revision the document is largely historical: the Content >> Transformation Guidelines document, published under the title >> "Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies" [LINK to >> http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/] and initially inspired by the set >> of requirements identified in this document, has evolved based on >> available technologies and feedback and may not precisely follow these >> requirements anymore. ]] >> >> or by something similar in real English ;) >> >> >> >> In the Status of This document section, I would also replace: >> [[ non-normative W3C Recommendation on content adaptation ]] >> by: >> [[ Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies ]] >> and update the link to point to >> http://www.w3.org/TR/ct-guidelines/ >> as the charter it currently points to is obsolete. >> >> I'll update the Status of This Document section when I prepare the >> document for publication anyway to note that the we do not expect to >> work on this document any further (and as required to please the >> publication rules checker), so I can handle that second update unless >> someone disagrees. >> >> >> Francois. >> >> >> Jo Rabin wrote: >>> As discussed on last week's call I have made some minor edits to the >>> CT Problem Statement. I've taken the liberty of preparing it for >>> publication on Thursday next week in the hope that we will agree that >>> on our call on Tuesday. >>> >>> The document is at [1] and diff from the published version is at [2]. >>> >>> Jo >>> >>> [1] >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html >>> >>> >>> (http://tinyurl.com/yjqphe2) >>> >>> >>> [2] >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-ct-landscape-20071025/&doc2=http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/ProblemStatement/CTProblemStatement.html >>> >>> >>> (http://tinyurl.com/yzww24f) >>> >>> >
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 08:30:30 UTC