Re: MWABP: 3.6.4 Support a non-JavaScript Variant if Appropriate

For linking purpose, I note that the <noscript> point raised by Alan was 
also raised by Marc Wilson in a last call comment (LC-2287):
 
http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/37584/WD-mwabp-20091006/2287 
(member-only link)
 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/2009OctDec/0049.html

Francois.


Rotan Hanrahan wrote:
>> ... I would add that it 
> should contain a minimal explanation and a link to an alternative, to 
> avoid unnecessarily sending people alternative content they may not need 
> or ever read.
> 
> Well, maybe. The <noscript> content might itself be a suitable alternative, rather than a link to an alternative or some explanation/apology regarding the absence of the scripted feature. It all depends on what you were trying to achieve with the script.
> 
> Still, you are absolutely correct regarding the use of a DDR as a first line of defence. Use the DDR to avoid sending things to the client that won't work or could even be harmful. After that, use it to select what is best for the device from whatever options are available to you. Of course, the BPs should also give you pointers as to how to proceed when you are unfortunate enough to be without a good DDR. Proceed with caution, is perhaps the best advice.
> 
> ---Rotan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Chuter [mailto:achuter@technosite.es] 
> Sent: 25 November 2009 12:16
> To: MWI BPWG Public
> Cc: Rotan Hanrahan
> Subject: Re: MWABP: 3.6.4 Support a non-JavaScript Variant if Appropriate
> 
> Rotan Hanrahan wrote:
>> If your DDR doesn't indicate script-capability, and the script 
>  > isn't that important, then don't use the script. You'll save a
>  > bit of bandwidth too. If the script is important, and there's
>  > some doubt about whether the device will execute it, the
>  > <noscript> element is advised.
> 
> Now I understand, the DDR should be the first line of defence. If you 
> know that device doesn't support script then don't even bother with 
> script or noscript.
> 
> If you are unsure, and use the noscript element, I would add that it 
> should contain a minimal explanation and a link to an alternative, to 
> avoid unnecessarily sending people alternative content they may not need 
> or ever read.
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 07:07:17 UTC