- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:26:34 +0100
- To: Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com>
- Cc: public-bpwg@w3.org
Le mercredi 11 mars 2009 à 02:36 -0700, Eduardo Casais a écrit : > Regarding the issue of mandating the preservation of style sheets flagged > with media="all" or not, a quick search produced the following results. Just a quick note that the "heuristics" that was mentioned in the BPWG call was <link rel="alternate" href="" media="handheld" />, which doesn't have anything to do with style sheets. I don't know if your suggestions below were meant in the search for an additional heuristic targeted specifically at style sheets. Dom > It appears that a number of browsers, especially newer, more powerful ones, > ignore CSS marked as media="handheld" in favour of style sheets identified > as "full Web". See www.alistapart.com/articles/returnofthemobilestylesheet. > > This raises two questions: > > a) Whether CT-proxies actually modify style sheets sent to those advanced > mobile browsers that can handle CSS intended for desktop browsers (as in > media="screen" or media="all"), and if so why? > > b) How to define a mandatory rule listed in 4.2.8 to ensure that requests > and responses from browsers that can handle desktop content be preserved. > > An approach to address the issue is by extending media declarations thusly: > media="handheld, all". > > Unfortunately, there are feature phones that cannot handle this syntax; no > CSS gets loaded at all (Some SonyEricsson for instance). Duplicating the > links to external CSS is possible (i.e. one link to a style sheet marked > as "all", another to the same style sheet marked as "handheld"), but then > this raises a further question: > > c) Is it reasonable to expect application providers to introduce redundant > declarations into their content just because CT-proxies might interpret > media="all" as "in principle not good for handheld", in contradiction to > the CSS standard, section 7.3, where it is defined as "suitable for all > devices"? > > E.Casais > > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 14:27:05 UTC