- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:35:22 +0000
- To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "Mobile Web Best Practices Wo rking Group WG" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Something has trouled me for a while about the notion of a mandatory heuristic. If it's mandatory, it's not a heuristic, surely? Also, i'm sorry not to have been on the call, but are we really sure we want to mandate this? I fear that this locks the mobile web into specific doctypes that will become increasingly irrelevant. Fwiw, i think that mandatory heuristics are a bad idea and basically regressive in effect. Jo --- original message --- From: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org> Subject: Re: ISSUE-288 (includeNonMandatedHeuristics): Should the Content Transformation Guidelines include a non normative list of mobile heuristics? [Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies] Date: 10th March 2009 Time: 3:06:58 pm Le mardi 10 mars 2009 à 14:44 +0000, Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker a écrit : > ISSUE-288 (includeNonMandatedHeuristics): Should the Content Transformation Guidelines include a non normative list of mobile heuristics? [Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies] I should clarify: non-normative and non-mandated heuristics: i.e. heuristics that CT proxies may or may not take into account to determine whether they'll transform or not - in opposition to the mandated heuristics that have been determined as per ISSUE-286 in the call today (minutes upcoming). Dom > http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/288 > > Raised by: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux > On product: Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies > > Cons: create confusion on non-mandated vs mandated, can be an endless list, would go outdated quickly > > Pros: give some hints to content providers on things ct proxies are likely to consider
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 19:36:52 UTC