- From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:12:17 +0100
- To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: <achuter@technosite.es>, "Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Ok, that is sort of what I am thinking of as well. However, what is the reasoning for making the distinction between properties that are detectable server side (e.g. UA) and those that are device profile based (e.g. memory size) and are not being detected at all? Either way they are "relevant" device properties. In that vein, which additional information would be beneficial here? -- Kai -----Original Message----- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [mailto:dom@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:26 AM To: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich Cc: achuter@technosite.es; Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG Subject: RE: [questionnaire] Addendum to Mobile Web Best Practices ready for publication? Le jeudi 05 mars 2009 à 09:34 +0100, Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich a écrit : > > * The section for each BP "Relevant device properties" needs some > > explanation. I understand that this means properties that can be > > detected on the server. This is covered in the BP document under > > "3.5 Establishing Context" [4]. > > -- Dom had suggested putting this in and I think his intention was > different. > Dom? I think my intention is roughly what Alan describes; it really was the properties on which one needs to evaluate to produce content that follows the best practices; in general, this means detection on the server side, but it may also be a more arbitrary choice of range of targeted devices, some client-side adaptation, etc. Dom
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 11:12:59 UTC