public-bpwg@w3.org from June 2009 by date

Tuesday, 30 June 2009

• [minutes] Tuesday 30 June 2009 teleconf Francois Daoust
• RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. edward.mitukiewicz@orange-ftgroup.com
• Re: BPWG Teleconference 2009-06-30 Yeliz Yesilada
• RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Rotan Hanrahan

Monday, 29 June 2009

• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Jo Rabin
• RE: BPWG Teleconference 2009-06-30 Ignacio Marín Prendes
• RE: ACTION-892: Information Conformance Statement for CT Guidelines Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: ACTION-892: Information Conformance Statement for CT Guidelines Francois Daoust
• BPWG Teleconference 2009-06-30 Jo Rabin

Friday, 26 June 2009

• mobileOK Scheme and Policy published Francois Daoust

Thursday, 25 June 2009

• Re: ACTION-892: Information Conformance Statement for CT Guidelines Charles McCathieNevile
• 4.1.5 and 4.2.9 unclear - AND or OR Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 24 June 2009

• Re: MWBP-WCAG doc - Audience section Yeliz Yesilada

Tuesday, 23 June 2009

• MWBP-WCAG doc - Audience section Shawn Henry
• RE: [Canceled] MWBP Teleconference 2009-06-23 Sean Patterson
• [Canceled] MWBP Teleconference 2009-06-23 Francois Daoust
• RE: ACTION-892: Information Conformance Statement for CT Guidelines Rotan Hanrahan
• RE: ACTION-982: style sheets Eduardo Casais
• tests for XSS Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: ACTION-982: style sheets Jo Rabin
• RE: ACTION-982: style sheets Eduardo Casais
• ACTION-892: Information Conformance Statement for CT Guidelines Francois Daoust
• Re: ACTION-983: same-document reference Francois Daoust
• Re: mobile browser support for CSS media queries (was: RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection.) Bruce Lawson
• mobile browser support for CSS media queries (was: RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection.) Jo Rabin
• RE: ACTION-983: same-document reference Jo Rabin
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Bruce Lawson
• Re: ACTION-983: same-document reference Francois Daoust
• Re: ACTION-957: Ask Rigo to consider Jo's comments and revise mobileOK license accordingly Rigo Wenning

Monday, 22 June 2009

• RE: ACTION-983: same-document reference Jo Rabin
• Re: ACTION-983: same-document reference Francois Daoust
• ACTION-983: same-document reference Francois Daoust
• Re: WCAG-MWBP document ready for publication Alan Chuter
• RE: ACTION-982: style sheets Jo Rabin
• Re: ACTION-981: user preferences Eduardo Casais
• Re: CTG: clarifications needed / HTTP header fields, URI patterns Eduardo Casais
• RE: repository of ICS / testing mailing list. Jo Rabin
• RE: ACTION-985: relevant terminology for section 5. Jo Rabin
• RE: clarifications needed / HTTP header fields, URI patterns Jo Rabin
• [agenda] MWBP Teleconference 2009-06-23 Jo Rabin
• Re: ACTION-981: user preferences Francois Daoust
• CT Guidelines Draft 1s Jo Rabin
• Re: CTG: clarifications needed / HTTP header fields, URI patterns Francois Daoust
• Re: New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) / comments Eduardo Casais
• Re: ACTION-957: Ask Rigo to consider Jo's comments and revise mobileOK license accordingly Francois Daoust
• Re: New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) / comments Francois Daoust
• Re: New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) / comments Francois Daoust
• Re: New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) / comments Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) / comments Adam Connors
• RE: New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) / comments Eduardo Casais
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Jo Rabin
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Adam Connors
• FYI: Privacy Jungle: Data Protection in Social Networks 전종홍
• mobileOK Scheme 1.0 2090622 Final Draft Jo Rabin

Sunday, 21 June 2009

• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Bruce Lawson

Saturday, 20 June 2009

• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 19 June 2009

• ACTION-982: style sheets Eduardo Casais
• ACTION-981: user preferences Eduardo Casais
• CTG: clarifications needed / HTTP header fields, URI patterns Eduardo Casais
• New MWABP draft. (LC candidate ?) Adam Connors
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Bruce Lawson
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Adam Connors
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Bruce Lawson
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Adam Connors
• RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Bruce Lawson
• RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
• RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Adam Connors
• RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Adam Connors
• RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA

Thursday, 18 June 2009

• CTG: repository of ICS / testing mailing list. Eduardo Casais
• ACTION-985: relevant terminology for section 5. Eduardo Casais
• Re: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Adam Connors
• RE: MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Rotan Hanrahan
• MWABP: Revised text for Device Capability Detection. Adam Connors

Wednesday, 17 June 2009

• transcoding and security Luca Passani
• RE: MobileOK scheme 전종홍

Tuesday, 16 June 2009

• [minutes] Tuesday 16 June 2009 Teleconf Francois Daoust
• Re: ACTION-957: Ask Rigo to consider Jo's comments and revise mobileOK license accordingly Francois Daoust
• Re: ACTION-957: Ask Rigo to consider Jo's comments and revise mobileOK license accordingly Rigo Wenning
• RE: MobileOK scheme Manrique Lopez
• RE: MobileOK scheme Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: MobileOK scheme Phil Archer
• Re: MobileOK scheme Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: MobileOK scheme Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: MobileOK scheme JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
• RE: MobileOK scheme Jo Rabin
• Re: ACTION-957: Ask Rigo to consider Jo's comments and revise mobileOK license accordingly Phil Archer
• RE: MobileOK scheme Manrique Lopez

Monday, 15 June 2009

• Re: MobileOK scheme Phil Archer
• RE: Content Transformation Guidelines 1r Sean Patterson
• Re: MobileOK scheme Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: MobileOK scheme JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA
• RE: MobileOK scheme Jo Rabin
• Re: [agenda] BPWG Teleconferece 2009-06-16 Eduardo Casais
• Re: MobileOK scheme Charles McCathieNevile
• CT guidelines: X-Device-* definition Francois Daoust
• Regrets Tom Hume
• [agenda] BPWG Teleconferece 2009-06-16 Jo Rabin
• Apologies for 16th Jun. Adam Connors

Friday, 12 June 2009

• Reminder: June 19 deadline for comments re LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration spec Arthur Barstow

Thursday, 11 June 2009

• Best Practices and mobileOK in Wordle Jo Rabin

Wednesday, 10 June 2009

• RE: MobileOK scheme Jo Rabin
• Re: MobileOK scheme Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed [recent mobile CSS sprite case study] Rotan Hanrahan
• RE: MobileOK scheme Rotan Hanrahan
• RE: MobileOK scheme Jo Rabin
• RE: MobileOK scheme Rotan Hanrahan
• RE: MobileOK scheme Jo Rabin
• BP addendum progress Phil Archer
• RE: MobileOK scheme Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed [recent mobile CSS sprite case study] Adam Connors
• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed [recent mobile CSS sprite case study] Stephanie Rieger

Tuesday, 9 June 2009

• RE: MobileOK scheme Jo Rabin
• MobileOK scheme Charles McCathieNevile
• [minutes] BPWG Teleconference 2009-06-09 Jo Rabin
• Re: ACTION-957: Ask Rigo to consider Jo's comments and revise mobileOK license accordingly François Daoust
• ACTION-957: Ask Rigo to consider Jo's comments and revise mobileOK license accordingly Phil Archer
• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed [recent mobile CSS sprite case study] Adam Connors
• ACTION-952, ACTION-953 and ACTION-954 on MobileOK Scheme 1.0 Jo Rabin
• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed [recent mobile CSS sprite case study] Tom Hume

Monday, 8 June 2009

• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed [recent mobile CSS sprite case study] Eduardo Casais
• RE: ACTION-929: CTG abstract Jo Rabin
• Re: Content Transformation Guidelines 1r Luca Passani
• [agenda] BPWG 2009-06-09 Jo Rabin

Sunday, 7 June 2009

• Content Transformation Guidelines 1r Jo Rabin

Friday, 5 June 2009

• Web Performance Best Practices Francois Daoust

Wednesday, 3 June 2009

• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed [recent mobile CSS sprite case study] Stephanie Rieger
• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed Eduardo Casais

Tuesday, 2 June 2009

• Re: Vodafone launching its own mobile app Philipp Hoschka
• Re: Vodafone launching its own mobile app Peter-Paul Koch
• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed Andrea Trasatti
• [minutes] 2 June 2009 Teleconf Francois Daoust
• Vodafone launching its own mobile app gina@alierra.com
• Regrets for 2009-06-02 Eduardo Casais
• RE: Package namespace for checker extensions Rotan Hanrahan
• Re: Package namespace for checker extensions Francois Daoust
• Package namespace for checker extensions Alan Chuter
• [agenda] Agenda for today's call Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group
• Bing for mobile Rotan Hanrahan

Monday, 1 June 2009

• Re: ACTION-961: usefulness of multipart-mixed John Hardi

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009 15:25:12 UTC