W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family?

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:16:25 -0600
Message-ID: <497F2549.4020105@aptest.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>, public-bpwg <public-bpwg@w3.org>, ishida@w3.org, public-xhtml2@w3.org

Thanks for this feedback.  Note that we are in the process of creating 
Proposed Edited Recommendations for XHTML 1.1, XHTML Print 1.0, and 
XHTML Basic 1.1 to incorporate their new XML Schema implementations.  It 
might be possible to add this attribute at the same time.  The Working 
Group will discuss this soon.

Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 janvier 2009 à 17:05 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux a
> écrit :
>>> Can you determine whether the MWBP would be prepared to work with us
>>> to try the PER route and get back to us if support, and possibly
>>> assistance, would be forthcoming. 
>> I'll bring that to the MWBP (whose next meeting is on Tuesday); I'm
>> fairly confident there will be support for it;
> The topic was discussed today in the BPWG call, and the group formally
> supports adding the lang attribute to the XHTML family.
> http://www.w3.org/2009/01/27-bpwg-minutes.html#item03
> Dom

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 15:19:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:59 UTC