As per the action, the intent of section 5 must be clarified. I propose modifying the current paragraph as follows: ----- The operator of a content transformation proxy SHOULD make available an interface through which the functions of the proxy can be exercised. The operations possible through this interface MUST cover those necessary to settle the outcome of all conformance statements listed in section B. The interface MUST be reachable from terminals with browsing capabilities connected to the Web via a conventional Internet access environment at the tester's premises; accessing the interface MAY necessitate adjusting standard Web browsing configuration parameters -- such as specifying a proxy IP address and port on a desktop browser, or activating a WAP setting on a mobile browser. ----- Which begs the question: do operators already have their CT-proxies available on the Web for the purpose of external checking of how they work? E.CasaisReceived on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 07:34:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:53 UTC