W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: ACTION-893: Start putting together a set of guidelines that could help address the security issues triggered by links rewriting.

From: Tom Hume <Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:22:13 +0000
Message-Id: <9BDC4AA0-9437-48E5-AFED-05D33DAB3078@futureplatforms.com>
To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>


On 20 Jan 2009, at 22:54, Luca Passani wrote:

> wrt Whitelist, this is a problem for transcoder vendors to solve.  
> They may decide to create a common sire where companies can  
> authorize all transcoders to break their HTTPS logins in one fell  
> swoop.

Is there nothing we can do about this, particularly if it's in the  
interest of content providers?

> Anyway, the fact that one content provider approves that one  
> transcoder breaks HTTPS on its site, does not mean that the same  
> content provider is OK with all transcoders breaking HTTPS on its  
> site.


I completely agree; in fact I think I pointed that out :) But it does  
mean that such cases exist.

--
Future Platforms Ltd
e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com
t: +44 (0) 1273 819038
m: +44 (0) 7971 781422
company: www.futureplatforms.com
personal: tomhume.org
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 23:22:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:59 UTC