On 20 Jan 2009, at 22:54, Luca Passani wrote: > wrt Whitelist, this is a problem for transcoder vendors to solve. > They may decide to create a common sire where companies can > authorize all transcoders to break their HTTPS logins in one fell > swoop. Is there nothing we can do about this, particularly if it's in the interest of content providers? > Anyway, the fact that one content provider approves that one > transcoder breaks HTTPS on its site, does not mean that the same > content provider is OK with all transcoders breaking HTTPS on its > site. I completely agree; in fact I think I pointed that out :) But it does mean that such cases exist. -- Future Platforms Ltd e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com t: +44 (0) 1273 819038 m: +44 (0) 7971 781422 company: www.futureplatforms.com personal: tomhume.orgReceived on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 23:22:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:59 UTC