- From: Tom Hume <Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:20:01 +0000
- To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
On 20 Jan 2009, at 13:21, Luca Passani wrote: > it scales. Don't listen to Opera. I have been involved with similar > projects in the past. The top 50 to 100 sites will cover over 50% of > the traffic. Of course, whitelisting has extra cost for transcoders. > But this is only fair. How would it work from a content providers perspective? Would they need to register their service individually, or would some sort of aggregated whitelist make sense? I've wondered about such things before [1]... If this is a worthwhile effort, then whether or not it sits within a W3C document, perhaps it's worth pursuing? Is there room for an analogous project to WURFL and GURFL to document such things? Tom [1] http://www.tomhume.org/2008/03/mobile-transcod.html -- Future Platforms Ltd e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com t: +44 (0) 1273 819038 m: +44 (0) 7971 781422 company: www.futureplatforms.com personal: tomhume.org
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 20:20:55 UTC