W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > August 2009

AGENDA for today's call

From: Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group <Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:52:35 +0200
Message-ID: <C6B05493.446F%daniel.appelquist@vodafone.com>
To: "Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi all --

Sorry for not getting this out in a timely fashion! :)

We will indeed be holding a call today --

Details as follows:

Logistics
-----
Chair: DKA
Team contact: francois
Known regrets: Jo

Date: 2009-08-18T1330Z
  0630 US Pacific
  0930 US Eastern
  1430 UK/Ireland
  1530 CET
  1630 Helsinki
  2230 South Korea

IRC: irc://irc.w3.org:6665#bpwg

1. CT Guidelines - Remaining Actions
-----
X-header IETF discussion (see below)
Issues and actions: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products/12

2. Addendum to BP (BP1.5) - Status update
-----
Old actions: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products/9

3. MWABP - Status update
-----
Issues and actions: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products/14

4. Actions and Issues
-----
By product:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products

5. AOB
-----



On 17/08/2009 10:41, "François Daoust" <fd@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> For group review. Dan (I think you chair tomorrow's call), could you add
> this to tomorrow's agenda?
> 
> There was some discussion on the IETF mailing-list last week on the use
> of "X-" to prefix the HTTP header field.
> 
> Conclusion is:
> 1. I should be able to proceed with registration of the HTTP header
> fields in the provisional registry.
> 2. Moving from provisional to permanent is unlikely to be an easy task.
> It will require wide review within IETF, and some consensus withing the
> IESG (Internet Engineering Steering Group) that "X-" HTTP header fields
> may be introduced in the permanent registry, or an approved IETF
> proposed standard that defines the HTTP header fields.
> 
> I propose to move ahead with registration in the provisional registry as
> expected, but note I doubt we can move to Recommendation if the HTTP
> header fields are not permanently registered.
> 
> Latest message so far available at:
> 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/msg00107.htm>
l
> 
> The whole thread is currently the last one in:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/threads.html
> 
> Francois.
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 11:53:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:01 UTC