W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > October 2008

RE: ISSUE-283 (Jonathan Jeon): a microformat for mobileOK trustmark [mobileOK scheme]

From: 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:27:45 +0900
Message-ID: <03F823891AF33D499971F7DDAB8EAD17021675C2@email2.etri.info>
To: "Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Dear all, 

So, I was starting to define a mobileOK trustmark of microformat style.
It's a draft document. 
 
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dhpvgnmn_68dwzhntdt  
 
If it looks good, It will be consider in mobileOK scheme document or future work.

Best Regards, 

--- Jonathan Jeon 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 10:22 PM
To: public-bpwg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-283 (Jonathan Jeon): a microformat for mobileOK trustmark [mobileOK scheme]



ISSUE-283 (Jonathan Jeon): a microformat for mobileOK trustmark [mobileOK scheme]

http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/283


Raised by: Jonathan Jeon
On product: mobileOK scheme

Currently, we (korean community) are trying to apply the machine-readble mobileOK trustmark (like POWDER) within our pilot service.

But, a trustmark of POWDER style seems to be not easy to use on current browser. 
 
I think there are some issues to use of POWDER-based trustmarks.
- not simple, complex
- cannot apply to current mobile browser
- cannot append within (X)HTML file 
- should manage separated POWDER xml file 

For this reason, I think we need to consider the simple mobileOK trustmark that like microformat style.





Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 13:28:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:59 UTC