- From: Tom Worthington <Tom.Worthington@tomw.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:57:50 +1100
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>,"EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
At 06:42 AM 24/10/2008, Shawn Henry wrote: >The final version of "Shared Web Experiences: Barriers Common to >Mobile Device Users and People with Disabilities" has been published >at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences> ... Perhaps the document should be re-titled: "Failure to Share Web Experiences: Lack of Commonality by W3C Committees a Barrier to Mobile and Web Accessibility". ;-) This document was disappointing. From the title I expected a list of barriers and then perhaps suggested ways to overcome them for both mobile users and those with a disability. But what I got was an artifact from a dispute between two groups of standards writers. This is of little interest, or value, to those who want help designing web pages. If the mobile and accessible standards writers can't agree on common standards, then it would be better to be honest about it and make that clear, rather than obscuring the fact in complex technical language. Web designers should be clearly told that the standards makers have failed to agree and so the rest of us have to sort out it out as best we can. A document which lists the differences and similarities between the mobile and accessibility standards is of use, but it should have a title which reflects that is what it is. This should not be dressed up as something more than it is. Tom Worthington FACS HLM tom.worthington@tomw.net.au Ph: 0419 496150 Director, Tomw Communications Pty Ltd ABN: 17 088 714 309 PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617 http://www.tomw.net.au/ Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Australian National University
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 00:14:28 UTC