New draft 2008-11-12 of mobileOK Scheme

Hi everyone.

Following Jo's post yesterday, he and I have been Skype-chatting this 
morning with the result that I have been through the doc with my 
grammarian pedantry hat on and made some editorial changes. None of 
these are substantive but the latest version of the scheme doc is now at 
[1].

Although editorial in nature, I should perhaps point out a couple of 
changes I've made:

Under Section 1.4 mobileOK Checker.

Yesterday's text:
"This package is used to provide a Web interface as part of the W3C 
Validator. Other Web based checkers also exist, for example [@@]."

Today's version:
"This package is used to provide a Web interface as part of the W3C
Validator. Other Web based checkers may also be created that adhere to
the mobileOK Basic 1.0 Tests [mobileOK]."


Under section 2.1 The mobileOK Trustmark.

Yesterday's text:
"When displaying a mobileOK trustmark, the image should be served from 
the same server as the resource, but in any case not from the W3C site. 
Note that the W3C copyright image, as provided, is a PNG image and hence 
is not suitable for use on mobileOK representations of pages, though it 
may be used on other representations.

The trustmark is a W3C copyright image which may only be used in 
accordance with the W3C mobileOK license [LICENCE]."

Today's text:

"When displaying a mobileOK trustmark, the image should be served from 
the same server as the resource, not from the W3C site. Note that the 
image is provided in PNG format and hence is not suitable for use on 
mobileOK representations of pages, though it may be used on other 
representations.

The trustmark is issued under W3C copyright and may only be used in 
accordance with the W3C mobileOK license [LICENSE], the key feature 
being that it may only be used in representations of resources that, 
when dereferenced in accordance with the mobileOK Basic 1.0 Tests, pass 
those tests."

Line 15 of the POWDER example references the POWDER doc creator's local 
copy of the logo.

Until the licence work has been done, I don't think there's any more to 
be done to this??

Phil.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Trustmark/20081112

-- 

Please note my new e-mail address. My ICRA/FOSI e-mail addresses will
not function after the end of November.

Phil Archer
w. http://philarcher.org/

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 12:43:36 UTC