- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:21:44 +0000
- To: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi folks, an update on the formal status of mobileOK Basic. All best Jo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 is a Proposed Recommendation (Call for Review) Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:03:35 +0000 Resent-From: chairs@w3.org Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:03:58 +0000 From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org> Organisation: W3C To: w3c-ac-members@w3.org CC: chairs@w3.org Dear Advisory Committee representative, W3C is pleased to announce the advancement of mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 to Proposed Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20081103/ The approval and publication are in response to this transition request: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008OctDec/0073 Please review the specification and indicate whether you endorse it as a W3C Recommendation or object to its advancement by completing the following questionnaire: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/mobileOK-basic10-tests/ Additional details about the review are available in the questionnaire. The deadline for responses is 23:59, Boston time on 2008-12-01. More information about the Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Working Group is available on their home page: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG Should this document become a W3C Recommendation, W3C expects to issue a press release and publish testimonials in support of the document. We encourage you to take advantage of this testimonial opportunity; please see the questionnaire for more details. If you should have any questions or need further information, please contact Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Team Contact. This Call for Review follows section 7.4.4 of the W3C Process Document: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#cfr Thank you, For Tim Berners-Lee, W3C Director, Philipp Hoschka, Ubiquitous Web Domain Domain Lead, and Francois Daoust and Dominique Hazaël-Massieux, Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Team Contacts; Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications ============================================== Quoting from the mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 W3C Proposed Recommendation 03 November 2008 ============================================== This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PR-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20081103/ Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/ Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20080610/ Abstract -------- This document defines the tests that provide the basis for making a claim of W3C® mobileOK Basic™ conformance and are based on W3C Mobile Web Best Practices [Best Practices]. The details of how to claim mobileOK conformance will be described separately. Providers of content which passes the tests have taken some steps to provide a functional user experience for users of basic mobile devices whose capabilities at least match those of the Default Delivery Context (DDC). mobileOK Basic primarily assesses basic usability, efficiency and interoperability. It does not address the important goal of assessing whether users of more advanced devices enjoy a richer user experience than is possible using the DDC. Status of this Document ----------------------- This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/. This is a Proposed Recommendation of mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0. It reflects changes made as a result of feedback received during the previous Candidate Recommendation phase and of comments received during the following Last Call review period. A disposition of comments report is available. The entrance criteria to Proposed Recommendation are met and detailed in the implementation report. The changes made to the document since last publication as a Last Call Working Draft are editorial clarifications with a view to removing potential ambiguities in the way some of tests need to be conducted. See the accompanying diff document to view the list of changes made to this document since the previously published (10 June 2008) Last Call Working Draft. Main changes are: * The text on invalid certificates for URIs with the scheme HTTPS was adjusted and moved to a separate section on HTTPS * Handling of HTTP errors was adjusted in the HTTP Response section * The cases when an object element should be treated as an Included Resource were clarified * The Object Element Processing rule was completed with a few additional warnings * Redundancy in the STYLE_SHEETS_USE test was removed This document has been produced by the Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group as part of the Mobile Web Initiative. This document is considered stable by the Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group. W3C Advisory Committee Representatives are invited to submit their formal review per the instructions in the Call for Review (see the Advisory Committee questionnaire). The W3C Membership and other interested parties are invited to review the document and send comments to public-bpwg-comments@w3.org (with public archive). The review period ends on 01 December 2008. Publication as a Proposed Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2008 00:22:52 UTC