- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:18:52 +0200
- To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- CC: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Thanks Jo, FYI (and so that you may update your copy of the doc), while preparing the doc for publication, I noticed and corrected (on the copy that is about to be published) the following: 1. in CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20080610/#CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT - the 3 notes had no ID, but they were referenced in the algorithm by "htmldoc", "regardless" and "known". I added the IDs. - the note on "a known HTML version" was referred to as "a known XHTML version" (with an X). The X makes sense since we're only talking about XHTML doctypes here. I renamed the note to "a known XHTML version". - there was no space between "the" and "DOCTYPE" in "if theDOCTYPE is not known" - there was an additional space at the beginning of the parentheses in "( regardless of its stated DOCTYPE)" 2. the link to XHTML Basic 1.1 still referenced the Working Draft, but it's published in CR. I updated the link to: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-xhtml-basic-20070713/ Francois. Jo Rabin wrote: > > Yes, folks, the the 40th editors draft is now available at [1]. The > modification to the HTTP User Agent Header section is a variation on a > theme by Rabin and Daoust. In addition, curiously, the document made no > reference to HTTP and a normative reference has been inserted. > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests/080606 > > > [Diff] > http://tinyurl.com/6r8xfc > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2FMWI%2FBPWG%2FGroup%2FDrafts%2FmobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests%2F080602+&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2005%2FMWI%2FBPWG%2FGroup%2FDrafts%2FmobileOK-Basic-1.0-Tests%2F080606 > > > Jo > >
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 13:19:26 UTC