W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: MobileOK Telecon, Tuesday 29th January

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:38:07 +1100
To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, "Phil Archer" <parcher@icra.org>, "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t5n35tzqwxe0ny@widsith.lan>

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:40:24 +1100, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:

> I continue to have reservations about the Pro initiative at this stage,  
> however respect the desire of members of the group to work on it.
> I have a thought that we need to assess the level of mobileOK Basic  
> support in the field, for the PR transition of the mobileOK Basic doc.  
> Since Pro depends on this it might be instructive for the Pro team to  
> understand how widespread this support actually is before committing  
> further work.
> Just a thought.

Indeed, it would be instructive to understand the support available so  
far. On the other hand, I have grave reservations about continuing the  
work on Basic without committing to analagous work on Pro.

Just a different thought.



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals   Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 01:38:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:51 UTC