- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:38:07 +1100
- To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, "Phil Archer" <parcher@icra.org>, "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:40:24 +1100, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> I continue to have reservations about the Pro initiative at this stage,
> however respect the desire of members of the group to work on it.
>
> I have a thought that we need to assess the level of mobileOK Basic
> support in the field, for the PR transition of the mobileOK Basic doc.
> Since Pro depends on this it might be instructive for the Pro team to
> understand how widespread this support actually is before committing
> further work.
>
> Just a thought.
Indeed, it would be instructive to understand the support available so
far. On the other hand, I have grave reservations about continuing the
work on Basic without committing to analagous work on Pro.
Just a different thought.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 01:38:46 UTC