- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:05:15 +0100
- To: public-bpwg <public-bpwg@w3.org>
The minutes of today's teleconf:
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html
and copied as text below.
François.
17 Jan 2008
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Jan/0025.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-irc
Attendees
Present
francois, jo, Magnus, Dom, Jason, MartinJ, Ed_Mitukiewicz,
Bryan_Sullivan, achuter, SeanP, Sean_Owen, abel, nacho,
miguel
Regrets
Kai, Adam, RobFinean, PhilA, Kemp, AlanTai, Roland, Charles,
Shahriar
Chair
Jo
Scribe
MartinJones
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Reports from Task Forces
2. [6]Report from Checker Task Force
3. [7]MobileOK Pro
4. [8]Accessibility Document
5. [9]BP2
6. [10]Update on Seoul
7. [11]AOB
* [12]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
Reports from Task Forces
Jo: was not able to have call last week
... so no further progress in last week
... will be sending out noted about Bryan's proposed text
... if no objections this will be the draft
... Francois has volunteered to lead the CT Task Force. Thanks very
much.
Francois: CT guidleline needs to move forward and I will try to make
progress
Jo: Thanks very much for "volunteering"
Report from Checker Task Force
Sean: Trying to get to a point where we can cut a new release of the
checker, as a Beta
... still some issues to fix
... issues are bing fixed. Will discuss on list whether it is ready
for a beta release
... may take another week or so
... would keep the beta in public for about 2 months then release as
1.0
Jo: Thanks for all the hard work
<dom> +1 to jo's position
Jo: would prefer to delay a little more and ensure that the beta is
at least complete
dom: agree with fixing all discrepancies from MobileOK before beta
Jo: There is a question as to whether the existing check should be
replaced anyway since the checker is already better
dom: There is a resource issue with doing this
MobileOK Pro
Jo: Regrets from Phil
... next call will be one week from today at 1pm
... UTC
Accessibility Document
<francois> [13]Relationship Between Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0
and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
[13] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwbp-wcag-20080117
achuter: Has been a lot work to get public working draft..
... Francois has helped a lot.. It is now ready to go. People should
have looked at it by now.
<dom> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Request Current Draft transition to First
Public Working Draft
Jo: We should all be very excited by this. We are putting into the
public domain in a somewhat incomplete state to get early comment
Francos: Wording in TOC is slightly different from other document
(see WCAG link)
<dom> Congrats to Alan!
Jo: any further comment?
<dom> RESOLUTION: Request Current Draft transition to First Public
Working Draft
<Zakim> dom, you wanted to talk about for pub date, shortname
Jo: Thanks to our beloved staff contacts for their cooperation and
collaboration. We will request the transition
<dom> RESOLUTION: doc to be published as mwbp-wcag on Jan 22
Dom: [discussion of short name and date]
Jo: We should think about working with EOWG to promote this document
<dom> "Please send feedback to both wai-eo-editors@w3.org (archive)
and public-bpwg@w3.org (archive)."
Alan: We don't have a forum for the discussion at the moment
Jo: Looking for a recommendation of what we should do for this
Dom: Suggest bpwg-comments
Jo: we would prefer all comments to be on one list so they should
not go onto two lists
<dom> (I meant "public-bpwg-comments@w3.org")
<dom> [14]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/
<dom> ACTION: ALan to update the comments list to
public-bpwg-comments [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) -
ALan
<trackbot-ng> Try using a different identifier, such as family name
or username (eg. achuter, atai)
<dom> ACTION: achuter to update the comments list to
public-bpwg-comments [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-619 - Update the comments list to
public-bpwg-comments [on Alan Chuter - due 2008-01-24].
Jo: we thank the Team in advance for their work on this
BP2
Bryan: current status: Sent out email requesting input
<dom> ACTION-592?
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-592 -- Edward Mitukiewicz to report whether he
can be editor of the document who shall not be named -- due
2008-01-03 -- OPEN
<trackbot-ng>
[17]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/592
[17] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/592
Bryan: this is the only progress in the last week.
<dom> close ACTION-592
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-592 report whether he can be editor of the
document who shall not be named closed
Jo: Ed regrets that he cannot assume co-editorship
... Open question is can anyone else assume that role?
... there are many benefits.
... [discussion of XML/HTML editors for preparing spec documents]
<dom> (as a reminder, [18]http://www.w3.org/2003/Editors/ has many
information for editors, and any addition to that page is also
welcome)
[18] http://www.w3.org/2003/Editors/
<scribe> ACTION: Jo to raise issue of co-editorship vacancy
[recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-620 - Raise issue of co-editorship
vacancy [on Jo Rabin - due 2008-01-24].
Bryan: received email from Phillip Hoschka re Mobile AJAX
Jo: take it up with Dan Appelquist
... is a formal liaison needed?
<dom> ACTION: Dom to check if W3C has a liaison with OpenAjax
[recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-621 - Check if W3C has a liaison with
OpenAjax [on Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - due 2008-01-24].
Dom: there isn't one in place now
Update on Seoul
Jo: People starting to make travel plans..
... BPWG meeting on Mon/Tue, overlap with UWA then DDWG on Thu/Fri
... is that correct?
<dom>
[21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-bpwg/2008Jan/0018.htm
l
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-bpwg/2008Jan/0018.html
Jo: We need to communicate this with members of the group. Should
have a further survey.
Dom: At this stage we should open a registration form but we are
waiting for all the logistical details from the hosts
Jo: So we will need to hold off until we have accommodation info.
... We should send out a reminder announcing the registration will
be open shortly
... Quick straw poll..
<dom> [I won't be coming to Seoul unfortunately due to a conflicting
commitment]
Jo: who is definitely not coming?
<achuter> +1
<srowen> (I cannot attend)
Jo: Who is definitely coming?
<francois> I'm coming
<Bryan> +1
<jo> +1
<Jason> I'm waiting for travel approval
<SeanP> I'm a hopeful
AOB
none
<achuter> bye
<Magnus> bye bye
<nacho> thanks, bye
<abel> bye
<jo> Thanks to Martin for Scribing
Thanks
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: achuter to update the comments list to
public-bpwg-comments [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: ALan to update the comments list to
public-bpwg-comments [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Dom to check if W3C has a liaison with OpenAjax
[recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: Jo to raise issue of co-editorship vacancy [recorded
in [25]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action03]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [26]scribe.perl version 1.130
([27]CVS log)
$Date: 2008/01/17 16:01:59 $
[26] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[27] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:03:28 UTC