- From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:39:03 +0200
- To: "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi, Sean I am right with you on this... > Being a broken record here, but this is also my > understanding, and an understanding that seems to underpin > the document. This is why I am not sure it was wise to decide > that there is no ADC, because there is in this doc, even if > not called by name. I'll call it "iPhone-ish". We can say we > don't want to name and ADC, but then if we do in spirit > anyway, not admitting it is only a handicap. I keep raising the same point - we would be well served to define an ADC. One thing of what you said I don't agree with or at least with the implication - the iPhone-ish thing. This sentiment that the iPhone is something special and is to be upheld as some hard to reach goal. I think ee need something like an ADC, something neutral. -- Kai
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 07:39:55 UTC