- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:34:49 +0200
- To: public-bpwg@w3.org
Minutes of our short call are available at: http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-bpwg-minutes.html ... and copied as text below. In short, documents need to be reviewed and commented: - the mobileOK Basic checker for bugs - the mobileOK Pro draft - the (soon available) Content Transformation Guidelines draft - the BP2.0 draft - the Accessibility doc -> Links to the docs are available in the Action! section of the WG's home page: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/ François [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Teleconference 03 Apr 2008 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Apr/0002.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-bpwg-irc Attendees Present Magnus, francois, jeffs, jo, adam, yeliz, drooks, MartinJ, Sean_Owen, Kai_Dietrich, abel, miguel, manrique, nacho Regrets rob, SeanP, Bryan, AlanTai, hgerlach, Sonnho, EdM, Shahriar, chaals, Dom Chair jo Scribe Adam Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]DDR Simple API 2. [6]Reports from mobileOK Pro 3. [7]Checker 4. [8]CT 5. [9]Accessibility. 6. [10]BP2 7. [11]Actions and Issues 8. [12]AOB * [13]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ DDR Simple API <jo> [14]DDR Simple API [14] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/latest <francois> [15]DDR Simple API latest draft [15] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/drafts/api/latest jo: Rotan has requested review from BPWG ... Document is going immediately to last call, looking for comments, support, questions...? ... no. Reports from mobileOK Pro kai kai: status-- zero feedback. revising tests... reworking to get more repeatable results. first ten reworked are in latest version of doc. ... working through remaining ten now. Checker sean: nothing much to report. fixing bugs. ... please look at it now, too late to send comments two weeks from now. jo: is there anything to say about rate that bugs are being reported? are they dropping off? sean: yeah, it's pretty well baked. kai: do you have feeling on what people are doing with checker ? is it being used ? sean: stats indicate some usage, not sure how much. CT jo: were going to have extended discussion but jo is still working through spec document. Heads up that we will want to make a resolution to FPWD next wk. ... it's yet another doc that requires you review, there has been a lot of activity and we need to get this out. Accessibility. jo: Alan is not on the call so will have to set this discussion aside for now. BP2 jo: Proposing to go to FPWG of BP2 next wk. To shake out early discussion of the points. ... Still lots of points of potential disagreement, but does no harm to get it out there. srowen: usually in favour of getting feedback. But there are still a number of things out of scope. Concerned that this is still too far from what we want to publish to make it public right now. ... Would like to discuss on application related points and if they're in scope. jo: inclined to agree on points but we should continue discussion on list since Bryan isn't here. <jeffs> note: corrected example code for 5.9.4 and 5.9.5 out to bryan for insertion (email system munged formating) Actions and Issues <jeffs> he will insert when returns from vacation jo: Not going to do this today, going to come up with a new process instead. Heads up that we will try and do this in a less boring way in future. AOB jo: A reminder that there are several documents we need to review. The documents are listed on our homepage under actions. Summary of Action Items [End of minutes]
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 14:35:24 UTC