- From: Paul Walsh <paulwalsh@segalamtest.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:02:13 +0100
- To: "'Michael Kaye'" <michael@mxtelecom.com>, <public-bpwg@w3.org>
It's possible to identify the device and then render the content with the use of an adaptation solution - this does not require the use of more then one URI. Go to www.aol.com using a PC and then use a mobile device. 1 URI different content. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: public-bpwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Michael Kaye > Sent: 19 August 2005 19:57 > To: public-bpwg@w3.org > Subject: Re: URLs and access issues > > > Paul Walsh wrote: > > >You don't need different URIs to represent > >different content - this is why we have adaptation. > > > > > (further to my email) > > Yes, you do. > > If you start requiring that all caches across the internet MUST NOT > cache any content (as it could change at any time, depending on the time > of day, the device, anything) then the gain in bandwidth use is going to > be staggeringly huge. > > Requiring that all mobileOK content is not cached is not a step forward > that I'd like to see occur. > > Michael.
Received on Friday, 19 August 2005 19:02:22 UTC