- From: Rotan Hanrahan <Rotan.Hanrahan@MobileAware.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:25:15 +0100
- To: "Daniel Barclay" <daniel@fgm.com>, <public-bpwg@w3.org>
- Cc: <ajaynaphade@jataayusoft.com>, "Neil Thompson" <neil.thompson@appswing.com>
As the iMode experience shows, the Accept header isn't always enough. And don't you just love to see "*/*" in an Accept header :) ---Rotan -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Barclay [mailto:daniel@fgm.com] Sent: 19 August 2005 19:22 To: public-bpwg@w3.org Cc: ajaynaphade@jataayusoft.com; 'Neil Thompson' Subject: Re: URLs and access issues Ajay Naphade wrote: > ... The device is identified based on the user-agent string and the > response is redirected accordingly. This way we are able to differentiate > the content not only based on website request or mobile device request but > also based on the type of device. WAP 1.0 compliant devices would receive > WML content with wbmp images whereas WAP2.0 compliant devices would receive > rich XHTML-MP content with jpg/png images. Shouldn't the device's browser see the appropriate Accept: header and shouldn't the server listen to the Accept: header? Daniel
Received on Friday, 19 August 2005 18:25:22 UTC