- From: Andrea Crevola <andrea.crevola@3juice.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:27:05 +0200
- To: public-bpwg@w3.org
Hi, the use of two different urls gives to the user the choiche for choose the version that is much closer to his needs. I think that this kind of selection has a positive effect on user experience (sorry if you have already discussed about this idea, but I've started reading the list only during last days...) and I think also that has to be mainteined someway. This involves adaptation: we can detect distribution context [1], but how many and which degrees of freedom we have to preserve for our user? And at what level (website, page, element, style)? What are your opinions? Best regards, Andrea [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-di-dco-20050118/ Holley Kevin (Centre) wrote: > Dear All, > > I am not entirely in agreement with this. Just looking at these sites: > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/ > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/mobile/ > > I much prefer the original non-mobile site even on my mobile because the photographs are missing from the "mobile" site. Many site designers seem to equate "mobile" to "text only" and rich media is really a trade off between screen estate, time to load and content. I am not clear that "one size fits all users" will really work for this. > > Regards, > > Kevin > -- e-mail: andrea.crevola[at]3juice.com msn: andrea.crevola[at]hotmail.com "Ogni minuto è un'occasione per rivoluzionare tutto completamente."
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 12:28:21 UTC