W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [minutes] CT Call 6 january 2009

From: Andrea Trasatti <atrasatti@mtld.mobi>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:56:12 +0000
Message-Id: <2E9EA5F9-F4A5-41FC-9E71-76053721EF88@mtld.mobi>
Cc: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
To: Luca Passani <passani@eunet.no>

Il giorno 07/gen/09, alle ore 19:05, Luca Passani ha scritto:

> Tom Hume wrote:
> > Was your opinion invalid when you worked for OpenWave? Of course  
> not.
> not invalid, but certainly biased (i.e. less credible) when talking  
> about something that impacted the business model of my employer.
> Novarra has shown on multiple occasions that they benefit from  
> transcoding as much as possible, so it is obvious that a statement  
> like "we can transcode mobile content to make it better" must be  
> evaluated in the context of a company which has economic interest  
> in doing so. I am not sure why I need to explain this to you. You  
> are supposed to know what biased means already.

Aren't you biased now that you run WURFL Pro full time and the user- 
agent is the key to your device detection product?

We are biased in a way, otherwise we would not be here and we would  
be sitting on a beach play volleyball.
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 18:56:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:20 UTC