- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:08:14 +0000
- To: casays@yahoo.com
- CC: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org
I think that what we are trying to get at is that access is provided from the developer's computer where that is placed in a conventional access arrangement in respect of the Web in general. Seems a bit wordy but if not clear then we should change current wording. Jo On 11/11/2008 10:39, Eduardo Casais wrote: >> The conformance statement would be a place to detail the >> first and the second is what is intended in this section. > > All right. > >> Conventional might be a better word. > > All right. > >> I take path to mean physical arrangements not protocols but >> if that's not clear we should discuss it. > > Since access in the Internet is mediated through protocols, which is the level of abstraction that most developers rely upon (not on the details of the physical network configuration), I believe a clarification is in order. > > E.Casais > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 11:09:37 UTC