Re: ACTION-709: Write some examples for 2.5.3

Sullivan, Bryan wrote:
> Francois,
> Slight modification/addition to your examples:
>  
> The preferences of users and of servers MAY be ascertained by means outside the scope of this document. These means include but are not limited to:
> - the use by transforming proxies of a disallow-list of Web sites for which content transformation is known to be useless and/or to break delivered content.
> - the use by the transforming proxies of an allow-list of Web sites for which content transformation is known to be necessary.

No problem with "disallow-allow".


> - user static preferences, e.g. provisioned by their CT service provider or directly by the user through self-care web sites.

I'm not sure I understand this one. Are you talking about persistent 
expression of preferences as listed in 2.5.1?
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/080313#d0e331
If that's the case, that's not totally out-of-scope.
If not, could you clarify?


> - terms and conditions of service, as agreed upon between the user and the CT service provider.

Agreed.

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 16:52:31 UTC