- From: Tom Hume <Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:51:54 +0000
- To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
Possibly spanners re inferring mobility and therefore "do not transform" from a text/vnd.wap.wml content-type: 1. Whilst WML content-types are 99.999% mobile, I do know that Sky in the UK used WML to deliver third-party content for their interactive TV service. I don't know if others have done the same: taking WML and using it in other contexts beyond mobile. I'd (personally) be happy to assume WML = mobile. 2. Do all mobile devices support WML? If not thenis there a potential role for transcoders to play here, bringing WML content to mobile devices not capable of rendering it? On 27 Nov 2008, at 08:44, Rotan Hanrahan wrote: > However, regarding the four "heuristics" that were listed, I'm not > sure if they should be considered as heuristics. These are very > strong indicators of intent. There is no sense of "guesswork" here. > If any of the four hold true, it is necessary to record that the > retrieved (or referenced) content is intentionally for mobile, > unless there is some bug/error. So barring bugs/errors, the four are > really *rules*, not heuristics, surely? -- Future Platforms Ltd e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com t: +44 (0) 1273 819038 m: +44 (0) 7971 781422 company: www.futureplatforms.com personal: tomhume.org
Received on Monday, 1 December 2008 09:52:32 UTC